top of page

Labels. They're like invisible tags we attach to people, often without realizing the weight those words carry. I know because I've been labeled myself. It all started when my life took a sharp turn, and I found myself grappling with my relationship with alcohol. The label "alcoholic" was thrust upon me, and it felt like a scarlet letter, marking me as different.

At first, I resisted it. Being called an "alcoholic" seemed like a harsh verdict, a one-word judgment that overshadowed all my other qualities and experiences. But as I began to confront my struggles with alcohol, I saw the power in that label. It was a wake-up call, a way to acknowledge my problem and seek help. The label "alcoholic" made me face the reality I had been avoiding.

In my journey to sobriety, I discovered the pros and cons of labeling. On one hand, it provided recognition and acknowledgment of my issue. It opened the door to a support system I didn't know I needed, with groups like Alcoholics Anonymous offering guidance and understanding. The label framed my journey as one of recovery, giving me hope for a better future.

Yet, there was a dark side to this label. Society often stigmatizes alcoholism, seeing it as a moral failing rather than a medical condition. The shame and guilt that came with the label were suffocating at times. It was as though my entire character had been reduced to a single word, "alcoholic," carrying preconceived notions and judgments.

As I began to recover as an alcoholic, I needed to address an issue that I had kept hidden for decades. As a young teenager, I endured sexual abuse for 16 months, it was a painful chapter of my life that left invisible scars. When I first heard the label "sexual abuse victim," it felt like an acknowledgment of the pain I had endured. It was a term that validated my experience, recognizing the trauma I had faced. The label "sexual abuse victim" also provided a starting point for understanding my journey towards healing. It was an acknowledgment of the wounds that needed attention and care. Through this label, I sought therapy, support groups, and the resources I needed to reclaim my life.

Yet, as time passed and I worked through my trauma, I began to feel conflicted about the label. The word "victim" felt limiting, as if it defined me solely by the horrors of my past. It carried a stigma that suggested vulnerability and helplessness. People often associated "victim" with a sense of powerlessness, and I didn't want to be seen that way.

I longed for a label that reflected my resilience, the strength I had found within myself to heal and move forward. And so, the term "sexual abuse survivor" began to resonate with me. It spoke to my ability to overcome adversity, to rise above the pain, and to rebuild my life. The label "sexual abuse survivor" felt empowering. It acknowledged my strength and the courage it took to face my past. It became a testament to my journey of healing, a story of triumph over adversity.

But, as with any label, there were cons. The word "survivor" could sometimes gloss over the ongoing challenges I faced. It implied that the battle was won, that the wounds had completely healed. In reality, healing is a complex and ongoing process. The label "survivor" could create unrealistic expectations, both from others and myself. There were moments when the label also felt isolating. Not everyone understood the depth of my experience or the complexities of recovery. Some assumed that once I was labeled a "survivor," I should have moved on completely from my past. It was as if they expected the scars to vanish entirely, and this lack of understanding could be isolating. I realized that labels, whether "sexual abuse victim" or "sexual abuse survivor," are tools to help us navigate our experiences. They can validate our pain, acknowledge our strength, and provide a starting point for healing. But they should never define us entirely.

As I navigated the complexities of labeling in my own life, I became aware of another realm of labels that demanded my attention - gender identity. In my daily life and in the support groups I attended, I met people who identified as "he," "she," "they," and various other pronouns. I was introduced to the world of transgender and non-binary identities, and it made me ponder the pros and cons of these labels.

Gender labels, I learned, were vital for many individuals. They provided validation and recognition for those whose identities did not conform to traditional norms. These labels built communities of people who shared similar experiences, offering a sense of belonging in a world that often misunderstands them. Moreover, gender labels served as platforms for advocacy and awareness, pushing for the rights and visibility of transgender and non-binary individuals.

But there was a flip side to this coin. Just like with the "alcoholic" label, gender labels had the potential to foster stereotypes and misunderstandings. Assuming that all transgender individuals fit into a particular mold was limiting and inaccurate. The binary system often excluded non-binary individuals, leaving them feeling marginalized and invisible.

In the end, I realized that labels were double-edged swords. They could empower, guide, and create communities, but they could also stigmatize, limit, and isolate. The key lay in understanding that labels should never define a person entirely. We are all multifaceted individuals with unique experiences and identities that go beyond any one label.

I learned that while labels are a part of life, it is our responsibility to wield them with care, to see beyond the surface and recognize the complexities of each person's journey. It is about understanding that labels are tools and not necessarily our entire identities, and that true empathy and compassion go beyond the words we use to describe each other. In the end, we are all more than the sum of our labels, and it is this beautiful complexity that makes us human.

13 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page